|
|
|
Most of these entries are Private.
[J] J M A M F J 2009 | |
|
1) Recognize yourself. 2) Fit yourself into your world logic-architecture. 3) Evolve fluid perception of yourself. + Changes situation to situation + Changes idea to idea + Change at will -> Self-induced self-perception -> Self-perceptions existing in parallel 4) Recognize self-perceptions (in yourself and others) 5) Fit self-perceptions into your world logic-architecture. 6) Evolve fluid architecture + Change at will -> World models existing in parallel 7) Recognize architectures (in yourself and others) 8) Fit architectures into your world logic-architecture. 9) Meta-programming + Recognize/create meta-programs (for yourself and others) + Fit meta-programs into your logic-architecture. + Engage meta-programs at will. -> Meta-programs running in parallel 10) Evolve self-evolving meta-programs (which act within yourself or within the world) 11) Create/evolve other individuals + (Biological or artificial) + Capable of performing tasks 1-11 + Better than you.
|
July 29th - Ceitjeist: as captured in a letter to Yussef
|
music |
|
franz lizst - piano concerto #1 |
|
YUSSEF!!! Ann and I are totally going to listen to John Frusciante in the dark. She has a thing for depressed heroin junkie music lmfao.
I'm scanning my journals. I'm going to post them all online. It's giving me perspective on my creative manic psychophilia 8] Open source my mind
Thank you for letting me play around! I might've stayed in loner mode in my flat the whole time elsewise >< Much gratitude for bestowing me the most stimulating timber I've yet to top XD
I'm learning recklessly. I have a recent obsession with order. I got a watch, and I plan on keeping record of everything I do every day and for how long..for the whole month @_@
I might write nonstop about NZ thoughtmemories. Jack Kerouac style: no paragraph breaks.
I'm in love with ambigrams. I found out "teams" is "sweat" upside down. "awesome" is itself upside down (if you draw your o's sloppy) and "MONK" with a backwards K is arousing as well o.O Ann and I plan on vandalizing Boston in ambigrams, perhaps in locations where their two sides will be seen from different angles >:]
Cheerios, CJ
|
 |
rotfl
|
July 21st - (Untitled)
|
Once I lied in a study: this study, in this text box. I was supposed to recall a time when I lied, stole, or cheated, but instead I entangled myself up in the strange loop of a liar's paradox. From some perspectives, this was an unethical act. Here I was, supposedly here to support scientific research, but instead I sought to corrupt the validity of its data. I felt creatively awesome. It gave me thrills, butterflies even! This whole paragraph was a lie, and I knew it. Adrenaline, endorphins, dopamine; a whole symphony of endogenous feel-good chemicals dancing about in my brain, inspiring the esoteric humor of an inside chuckle and attempted repressed smile.
|
 |
I love the way this is written, especially--and yeah I feel like a geekoid for saying this--the first sentence's syntax. And the last sentence is beautiful--modern but intelligent and virbrant ><. I'm always excited to read stuff that manages to be simultaneously dense and approachable---it makes for an incredible style.
For the second response I wrote: "Dear Mr.______, I am currently working as a clerk for SIVIL and have been instructed to inform you of my basic day-to-day routine. However, not only do I hold no intention of doing any such thing, but I am certain I will feel no obligation in the future, for I am emancipating myself from this cubicle labyrinth of illusionary self identity. Cheers! Unemployed and Unperturbed" But that was mostly because I had no idea of what to write pertaining to day-to-day routines at a company that wasn't explained very well in the task objective and wanted to move onto something else, lol
|
July 21st - Deja vu & the doDonts
|
Feeling like I'm back in the swing of awesome. Being productive. Yesterday I biked to Harvard Business School for a group economics study. We made a series of money decisions between $$ I would get and $$ a rando would get, and who gets to make those decisions. They're always set up so that everyone benefits most if everybody made compassion decisions, but you can also anonymously screw everyone over for your own selfish gain -- but if enough people do that then no one gains. I picked all my decisions based on the perspective of the group, rather than my own. Whatever sucks the most money out of Harvard *shakes fist* It's awesome how a perceived outward enemy creates a bonding group mind. Identities are defined in terms of others. Also I just like being weird. I ended up winning $27 (as if the Universe gave me a thumbs up for the good karma)
I'm almost done reading DMT: the spirit molecule. So awesome. I'll post a bunch of quotes. Subjects' encounters with entities are fascinating. I like how people in the experience tend to describe the universe/entities/mind of god as not benevolent, nor malevolent (weirdevolent is the word I neologized). Even devout religious spiritualists find this. One person says to the entities "god is love" and they're like "are you sure about that?" lmfao. I KNEW IT. Aliens were absurdists all along. I wonder what it all means. Also, Ann is in this book (Cassandra). I told my mom about the DMT aliens, and apparently her opinion of space aliens is the same as illegal aliens. I told her we were just projecting human nature onto these aliens -- we're materialistic, so we fear they would kill us off to get our natural resources; we probe and experiment on "lesser" beings without their consent, so we fear aliens would do the same to us. Total projection.
Went to Isaac's and shared a haha sandwich. We learned to sing a Simon & Gorfunnel tune. He got a book about Clive Wearing. I just ordered a ton of books from Amazon. Robert Anton Wilson's Prometheus Rising; a book on using genetic algorithms to grow quantum algorithms (o-o LMFAO); and Tryptamine Palace (this book about 5MeoDMT and toad-licking)
Got home. Secret colorful reptail projects. Secret chaos weather projects.
Feeling pretty groovy. Biking. Risking death. Reading books. Doing projects. Making art. Synthesizing ideas. I haven't even started many of the experiments I have planned.
|
 |
"I told my mom about the DMT aliens, and apparently her opinion of space aliens is the same as illegal aliens." LMFAO
+raises hand+ I'll help in mad science extraordinaire. My true calling is in my name; white lab rat.
|
 |
deja voodoo?
|
July 20th - The universe appears to be an intelligent being traveling backward through time.
|
music |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui4c0PKvVMU |
|
I was wicked deep in thought, on my couch, looking out the window, thinking about all this stuff I just read online about entropy, thermodynaics, chaos theory, emergence, negentropy, information theory, intelligence, Loschmidt's paradox, T-symmetry, and such; recognizing the inconsistencies in these concepts, and trying to synthesize new perspectives, until I laughed out loud. LMAO. Epiphany!
When you reverse time, and observe our world, the universe becomes an series of absurdly improbable coincidences. Like, eggs unshattering. Bombs unexploding. Impulses from the Earth coming up from the ground into my feet, launching me into the air to perfectly land me on a balcony. Given the right set of nearly improbable circumstances, a bomb could totally unexplode -- all that's required is that the entire chaos of the universe align itself perfectly to make it happen. That seems absurd. But if you consider intelligent systems like a human being, this is what we're doing all the time. We make matter do improbable things (like come together into a book); we align chaos to perform our will. SO.... If you reverse time, suddenly the whole Universe appears to be this intelligent system performing improbable feats of will.
Thus I conjecture: The universe appears to be an intelligent being traveling backward through time. Or, we're the ones moving backward through time. Or at least, it's really fun to imagine what things are like in reverse time. (It was at this point that I recognized how the window I was looking at while spacing out into my thoughts resembled an eye. The eye of a backwards-traveling universe intelligence. Imagine two intelligent beings, experiencing time in polar opposite directions, encountering each other. Wtf would that be like? Would they be able to recognize each other? Would they annihilate? Would they just ponder each other bizarrely?)
Humans only think we're intelligent because we think of time as moving forward. But if you put things in reverse the universe becomes a highly orchestrated series of coincidences progammed perfectly to lose entropy (and eventually collapse into a black hole (big bang)). Life is a self-annihilating complexity vacuum. The sun is black. Light streams out from eyeballs. Impulses from the earth rise up from the ground and make golfballs fly up into the air, perfectly nestling into golfclubs. Babies crawl into wombs. People are formed by maggot puke. Black holes are bright shining sources of creative information. (If in foward time the Earth were to fall into a black hole, in reverse time the Earth would appear to emerge from this shining magical source of creation. Black holes may as well be time-reverse gods.)
The laws of physics are totally time-reversible (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-symmetry). The only thing that's controversial is the second law of thermodynamics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loschmidt's_paradox), but I think the prevailing idea of entropy is incomplete. While statistically physical systems tend toward disorder, there is always a non-zero probability that it may become more ordered. And within that another probability that it may become ordered enough to self-replicate or perpetually complexify: emergence. Emergence is the unexploding bomb. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence)
If time is symmetric, then cause-and-effect has a time-reverse counterpart: retrocauses. Chains of retrocause-and-effect rippling backward from the future. This idea is merely a perception, a way of thinking about the world, since the distinction between cause and effect in physics is not made at the most fundamental level.
(Also I had the notion that subjective experience reverses polarity. Whatever the fuck that means. Like, maybe the everything-perspective is adopted?)
(OH another really fun thing is to imagine yourself as moving in the opposite direction of time right now. Plan the past. Plan to regurgitate that English muffin, unspread the peanutbutter, suck the poop back into my butt, and fall asleep. And then it starts to feel as if I really AM moving backward. I think the perceived foward-movement of time is just biological, and that in the future we'll be able to rewire that perception and get ourselves in all sorts of fun transhuman hijinks.)
|
 |
Note: all ideas are presented in a most enthusiastic and rationally inconsistent form, served with a helping of self-skepticism. The author encourages you to recognize ideas as works of conceptual art.
|
July 16th - Movie Awakens Metadreamers to their Unawakedness
|
music |
|
james brown - body heat |
|
July 16 FUCK YEAH The best way to write about the past is to start from recent history and work backwards. Outside on my back porch on my lappy. This is a really good place with no distractions save the bustling play of squirrels and the hypnotic drip drip of rainwater from the neighbor's gutter.
I WENT TO THE MOVIES WITH ANN RHEA OWEN AND NICK. So awesome. So friggen freaking god damn amazing O_O!!!! We saw The Inception at the IMAX. omFG OMFG It's like I made this movie. I often self-identify with ideas and memes. So if I am these memes, and these memes made the movie, then I made the movie. It's like the Matrix gone meta, with the regards of Occam's razor. I'm convinced everyone left the building in a reality--questioned daze. Collective dreaming? Totally possible. Totally. A few years ago, I worked out a few ways it could work. *posts diagrams*. First of all, it's totally possible to read brain activity, inparticular sensory activity. So what if you wire one person's visual cortex to video (goggles)? What if the person watches it? She watches what she imagines, and it feeds back into itself, and evolves. Total lucid dream creation. Now, what if you wire two people's visual cortexes to each other's video goggles? Each sees the other's imagination, interpreting them into the other's vision, interpreting them into the other's vision, etc. Collective imagination! So that's kind of like conscious dreaming. But you could also project directly stimulation into the cortex. As any senses as you like. Unconscious collective dreaming. Wooo! The dreams wouldn't be the same, but would be based on the same information, whose interpretations would be feedingback together and evolving. The tech for this is no where near closeby, perhaps some kind of nanoswam which lives on your neurons. Or perhaps some novel scanning/stimulating technique. O_O Alternatively, you could do this and give someone DMT and capture their trip. Fuck yeah. The dreamers in the Inception use IVs and I was imagining they were using something like DMT. One of my favorite movies.
Walking through Jordan's furniture is like a trip. All this furniture everywhere lmfao. It's like they're priming our subconsciuos minds with the American Dream: "high class" furniture and big screen home theaters. Yep. That's the American purpose. Television teleology.
LMAO. I was so bouncy and full of energy and saying everything on my mind. Me and Ann both agreed they were looking at me and thinking "Yep, another one [another Ann]" lmfao.
OH AWESOME IDEA: you know Escher's animal tessellations? Make a tessellation, except with video game things. Like a space invaders tesselation. Or mega man, if you can get away with it. *works on this task*
We played chachino. Totally kicked ass. It's awesome, it's a game about chaos and making split second probabilistic decisions. Like, you don't get enough time to rationalize probabilities, you have to act on gut instinct.
A lot of awesome philosophy; this movie. An hour in real life is 5 minutes in a dream. Which is 25 seconds in a dreamdream. Which is 2 seconds in a dreamdreamdream. lmfao. Dying a dream-sedation, falling into infinite limbo. OMG I laughed so hard at so many parts. Like when the girl made the city streets bend around. And when she started building the infinity room. And when he was describing the feedback loop of the subconscious, and drew that symbol I draw everywhere. And when those guys were fighting in the hallway while gravity was all shifting LMAO because the van in the meta-dream was flipping. And when he strapped all the dreamer together into this zero-gravity sandwich LMFAO. Laughing so hard. Whoever wrote this film must have had SO MUCH FUN writing it.
PEANUTBUTTER BANANA MILK SHAKE. We drove to SONIC afterwards. Superlate drive-in food place. ANN and I split a friggen 20 oz half-banana half-peanutbutter milk shake. It was the greatest thing we've ever tasted. We splurged it down in ZERO time.
I asked Ann if she wanted to come over to watch Owen's mini-play he wrote/performed with Rhea and Nick last year at Anime Boston. Miniskirts. He keeps winning 2nd place. The hangout quickly lengthened way beyond the limits of its pre-defined invitation, as we explored and convulsed in each other's cuteness.
"Anything you do is more intensified just because it's you doing it."
"My lucid dreams are never as good as you. I couldn't even imaginate this."
|
 |
There is an Escher exhibit at the MOS! I'm going in August.
|
 |
There is an Escher exhibit at the MOS! I'm going in August.
|
 |
Yeah, Inception was best. I think the time dilation worked the other way than you said. In dreams time expands.
It was written by Christopher Nolan, he also did the newer Batmans and said he'd been working on the screenplay for Inception for the past eight years.
|
July 14th - Meditations on Funk Philosophy
|
just for the funk of it just for the fun of funk
Exploring funky ideas. Just messing around, nothing serious. "Funk of it" I go the circle of 5ths with dom7 chords, I love the way it sounds, the infinite loop chord progression. Turbo tapping through the major scale. I end with a cool little melody that reminds me of the beginning of Octopus's Garden, and could be music to a puppet show. "Fun of funk" is more raw jamming. Two hand tapping with a dominance of dominants. Near the end I start imagining funky hxc breakdowns. There's a cool riff in 7/8. Can you hear how the drums would sound?
|
July 13th - Mail bag July 2010:: SELFISHNESS
|
music |
|
brushstrokes ::hello, i am july |
|
Aaron from Edmonton, Alberta writes in: "Is it wrong to be selfish?"
Well Aaron, that's a pretty general question. There's different kinds of selfish. There's different kinds of selves. Even if you're goal is to progress all of mankind, you're still being human selfish :] (what about the rest of the animal kingdom >O )
Your self is layered: you're a body, a mind, a thought, a memory, a moment, a set of ideas, a family, a group of friends, a society, a country, a species, a planet, a universe. You can adopt a whole spekkoek of identity ((I think I self-identify with ideas more than anything))
Some acts benefit one of your selves while harming another self. For example, if you are hording food from other people who are starving: you're being selfish with your body-self while lamely managing your society-self. If you join the army: you're being selfless with your body, lame with your friends-self (if no one wants their friend to die), selfish with your country, and lame with your species. Selfishness can be good: some systems work best when all parties are being completely self-interested (in computer science this is called a greedy algorithm). Evolutionary darwinism, for example: self-interest of the organism drives adaptation and complexity of the whole biosphere. Capitalism is another loose example: ideally the self-interest of the society is directly tied to the self-interest of the individual (though we've been totally disregarding the planet-self). Greedy algorithms only work when competition is fair (example: monopolies harm the entire economy; high-tech species like humans tend to overpopulate, hunt other animals into extinction, and harm the biosphere). It may seem like it is a bad idea to even act for the selfish interest of the human race in the first place, but think about this: if a planet-threatening asteroid was heading for Earth, guess who has all the freaking nuclear warheads and space-travel capabilities to pull an Armageddon and save the planet? That's right: nukes = save the planet.
Selfishness is not all that clear; everything is intertwined, selves are tied together, you have to intelligently consider everything. If you legitimately ask a girl out, you're being selfish to your body, your Aaron mind, your Her mind, your combined mind with her, your family, your species, and it's all good. But say someone else likes her (another you). Hmm. What do you do when you're both you? (If your opponent is you, then you win the girl either way.) Recall that fair competition can be healthy. If you compete to be the brighter bird in the forest, the more melodic singer, the more elegant dancer, the more secure nest-builder, the more humorous or creative or poetic or interesting monkey, then you serve to benefit the species by developing awesomeness and competing against others in sexual selection. You could also lie and make your opponent look bad-- but you would not want your opponent-self to play by those tactics, also you would be deceiving the very girl whose soul you're trying to connect to. Also as a species you might not want to select for dishonesty traits and rather select for compassionate ones (on the other hand, deception may be a sign of cunning/intelligence). Plus all that time spent deceiving could have been spent writing her a song :]. Recognize empathy as a turn-on. Recognize that winning a girl by means of pure awesomeness feels better than anything, and your relationship will be strongest, and you will have a clear conscience.
If you want to ask yourself whether you're being selfish, you might consider that everything is absurd and nothing matters. You might also intelligently consider your influence on all these levels, and which selves are more important than other selves and for what reasons, and how your actions butterfly through the whole system (karma). Violence begets violence. Being a dick begets being a dick. For example, if you pull a Hitler and try to conquer Europe, you might appear to be benefiting yourself and your country and your race, but it's a bad move if you care about your name, your legacy, and your lasting impression on history as a douchebag.
But maybe you don't particularly care about anything greater than your person. Just you. Okay. How do you intelligently manage your person then? Even your person is many selves: your body, your mind, your ideas, your role in society, your role with your friends. Especially your mind, which can believe its any self or hierarchy of selves. You probably want to avoid cutting off your left hand so that your right hand gets all the attention. Being selfish in the moment can hurt your future self. For example, if you manipulate a girl to sleep with you, that may benefit your present self.. but you may end up with a lasting reputation as a douchebag, and maybe deal with guilt. Or for example, if you cheat on your girlfriend: either you tell her and she hates you and she has trust issues for the rest of her life, or you hide it from her and you live in paranoia and you're never again able to bond the same with her on the deep levels of your souls and psyche together. If you don't have a clear conscience, if you're in a self-created hell, then you're missing out on the awesomeness of having a clear mind. But you can also destroy yourself. Evolve. Realize you used to be a dick and adopt a new awesome self. Ego death + rebirth. (I feel like this was originally the function of baptism. This also feels like the original meaning of the Buddhist/Hindu cycle of rebirth). If you're in an argument, you can make amends. If your country is evil and militant, you can overthrow the government and install a democracy. Mmm, fresh new self, hot off the oven.
Also, when being selfish, recognize the parts of your self which extend beyond your lifespan --- the IDEA of you. People's memories of you. Your legacy. What people remember you for. Your lasting impact on the world. The wake you leave behind. The infinite chains of cause-and-effect you set off. Your imprint in chaos. Biology dies, but ideas are immortal.
Also, if you recognize other people as yourself -- other yous from other points of view running around in an illusion of isolation -- then think about it.. you're making love to every beautiful woman on the planet simultaneously. You're skydiving out of planes, studying octopuses at the bottom of the ocean, and orbiting space. You're composing symphonies, engineering computers, writing novels, generating ideas, ending wars, and busy being the most complex thing in the known universe. You're freaking humanity. (You're also acting like a tumor on the planet, crippling yourself with war, spreading hate, and raping all these women simultaneously -- so it can be a difficult perspective to overtake. But you can short-circuit this by only identifying with awesomeness m/) But the useful thing about this perspective is that you can bypass jealousy: When was my left hand ever jealous of my right hand for doing all the fapping?
Nothing's even whatever. Also: everything is absurd. Sometimes purposely depriving yourself of things you want.. feels even better, you get existentialism points. Sometimes by not pursuing desire you gain that which was originally desired. I don't really know anything. This is just one perspective. Situations are more complicated than I make them seem. But maybe reading this has spurred your mind to think in some way. I hope you gain insight on your problem. CJ
|
 |
I read something I liked that described a nemesis as someone mostly containing the same qualities as you, but having maybe one deviation that makes them your nemesis.
Sometime ago I practiced bypassing jealousy after convincing myself of ego expansion. I imagined calling another person by the same proper name I would call myself, with an understanding that I was talking to myself, the same way I do in my head but this was out loud and to another person, like they were another limb to my body that could walk, talk, think, and do anything the old I could. This group of two people talking and interacting as if they were one, both thinking that they were the same person as two different bodies experiencing two different perspectives, would have perfect empathy for one another, and act as one person (like slime mold). I thought about what would happen to people's behavior if they changed their mentalities to think this way. My conclusion was telepathy, but I haven't thought about this for sometime, and your post reminded me.
- AL X
|
[J] J M A M F J 2009
|
|